
Harry Stachini is very easy to like. There is a warmth to his performance that makes you want him to succeed, and Lobster has the foundations of a very good comedy hour. Unfortunately, for me, it never quite found the energy or big laughs needed to make it a memorable one.
Comedy
There are some genuinely great jokes throughout Lobster, and the strongest part of the show is its central idea of change. Using the lobster’s need to shed its shell as a way of looking at the changes life throws at us is a clever through-line, giving the hour more structure than a collection of unrelated anecdotes.
Some of the callbacks are particularly well crafted, with earlier ideas returning later in a way that rewards paying attention.
The issue for me was that there weren’t quite enough of those bigger moments. I found myself waiting for the show to build towards something that would really land, but it never quite delivered the big punches I was hoping for.
Performance
Stachini is a good performer and undeniably likeable. His relaxed delivery makes him easy to listen to, and there is a natural warmth to the way he interacts with the audience.
At times, though, that relaxed style worked against the show. Rather than feeling like a fully developed hour of stand-up, parts of Lobster felt more like sitting down for a funny conversation with someone you have just met.
There’s nothing particularly wrong with that approach, but for me it meant the show lacked some of the energy and momentum I was looking for from a Fringe comedy hour.
The material
What I think Lobster demonstrates most clearly is that Stachini has plenty of potential.
The stories about change, family and life moving in unexpected directions give him strong material to work with, and there is a clear sense of personality behind them. The more personal moments are also where I found myself most invested in what he was saying.
I can particularly see Stachini doing well in the comedy club circuit. His easy-going presence and ability to tell a story should translate well to a club set, where the atmosphere is naturally more conversational and the audience is there primarily for the laughs.
For a Fringe show, however, I wanted a little more. The hour needed a few more moments that made me sit up and think, ‘that’s why I came to see this show.’
Final thoughts
Lobster isn’t a bad show. In fact, there is plenty to like about it: Harry is personable, there are some strong jokes, the central theme of change gives the show a solid through-line, and the callbacks show some thoughtful construction.
But I left feeling that I’d enjoyed the experience without being particularly excited by it. It didn’t stay with me in the way some of the stronger Fringe shows I’ve seen this year have.
Perhaps that’s the frustrating thing: I was willing more from Harry because there are clear signs that he has it in him. With a little more energy and a few more of those big comedic punches, I could see Lobster becoming a much stronger show.
For now, though, it’s a fairly average Fringe hour from a very likeable comedian, and one that makes me interested to see what Stachini does next.
Harry Stachini: Lobster, Fringe 2026
Summary
A likeable and capable comedian with some strong jokes and a clever central theme, but Lobster lacks the energy and standout moments needed to make it truly memorable. Stachini has plenty of potential, and I suspect he’ll be one to watch on the comedy club circuit.
What do you think? Let us know in the comments below!
Leave a Reply